Toll-Free Phone: (800) 285-1763
Phone: (949) 719-2649
Toll Free Fax: (888) 286-1840
Email: Okorie@187Law.com
Expert DUI drug charge attorneys handling cases throughout Orange County.
Call for a free consultation.
DUI Drug Charge Defense Attorney Okorie Okorocha
Education:
- BA in Biology, 1999
- Doctorate in Law, 2002
- M.S. in Forensic Science, Candidate 2012
Okorie Okorocha is a highly experienced attorney who works with clients throughout California to fight DUI drug charges. His expertise in criminal defense has earned him the name "Dr. DUI."
As a passionate advocate of animal rights, Mr. Okorocha has also litigated cases to ensure the protection of dogs and cats in California animal shelters. His work has resulted in changes to the California state law.
All cases are handled personally by Mr. Okorocha and never given to other staff members or less-qualified individuals.
SPECIALIST MEMBER of the CALIFORNIA DUI LAWYERS ASSOCIATION
Make sure to retain the best Orange County DUI drug charge attorney possible
Dr. DUI and his team of Orange County DUI drug charge defense attorneys will make sure that you get a fair trial and help you to get the justice you rightfully deserve. Call today at (949) 719-2649 or toll-free at (800) 285-1763 for a free drug charge case evaluation and to learn more about your legal rights.
CCN Game Changers featuring DUI attorney Okorie Okorocha
Excerpts of Real California DUI Case Summaries:
Stephen Eyre BALDOCCHI, Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, Respondent., 2008 WL 1842378 (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist., February 24, 2008), Appellant's Opening Brief, (No. A120238.)
...Completing The PAS Test. The Fourth Amendment generally bars the police from demanding more than one chemical test from a DUI arrestee. See People v. Fiscalini (1991) 228 CA3d 1639 BALDOCCHI completed a PAS test on the side of the road...
...percent of alcohol in a person's blood based upon grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath. Veh. Code, § 23152 ], and furthermore, such evidence may be used to prove the test subject's blood-alcohol concentration in a criminal prosecution. Id...
...when you consider that it is orally read (usually very quickly and only once) by a police officer doing a DUI investigation on the side of the road. There is no evidence that the admonition was read more than once to...PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. John PLOTCZYK, Defendant and Appellant., 2008 WL 1868602 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal.App. 4 Dist., February 22, 2008), Petition for Review, (No. 41894.)
...WORD COUNT CERTIFICATION ii ARGUMENT I. THE CONSTITUTIONAL EX POST FACTO RIGHTS OF APPELLANT BAR ALLEGING THE TWO (2) PRIOR DUI CONVICTION'S AT ISSUE IN THIS APPEAL BECAUSE THEY WERE WASHED OUT BY THE ELAPSING OF THE SEVEN (7) YEAR WASH...
...RESURRECTED THEREAFTER BY THE STATUTORY INCREASE OF TIME TO A TEN (10) YEAR WASH-OUT PERIOD TO ALLEGE A PRIOR DUI CONVICTION, UNDER STOGNER V. CALIFORNIA (2003) 539 U.S. 607. 1 II. CONCLUSION 8 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CITED CASES People v...
...Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, filed on January 14, 2008, affirming the use of the 1996 prior DUI convictions making the current DUI charge against him a felony rather than a misdemeanor. A copy of the opinion of the Court of Appeal is...Mark Edward DUMAIS, Petitioner, v. THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, In and for the County of San Luis Obispo, Respondent. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Real party in interest., 2008 WL 1752029 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal., February 20, 2008), Answer of the People of the State of California (Real Party In Interest) to Petitioner's Petition for Review, (No. S160559.)
...driving under the influence of alcohol and driving with a blood alcohol content of .08 percent or higher - his third DUI in the last seven years. On November 1, 2006, the People of the State of California (the “People”) filed a...
...the Petitioner alleging two counts of breaking the law. In Count 1, the Petitioner is alleged to have violated Section 23152(a) of the California Vehicle Code by driving a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. In Count 2, the Petitioner is alleged to have violated Section 23152(b) of the California Vehicle Code by driving a vehicle with a blood alcohol content of .08% or higher. The complaint further alleges that the Petitioner suffered two prior convictions, each for violating Section 23152(a) of the Vehicle Code , on February 5, 2001 and October 23, 2002, respectively. The Petitioner was arraigned, out of...
